Received: from e55.webcom.com (e55.webcom.com [206.2.192.66]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.5/8.7.5-MZ) with ESMTP id UAA28930 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Sun, 21 Apr 1996 20:49:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost by e55.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA229444116; Sun, 21 Apr 1996 17:48:36 -0700
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 17:48:36 -0700
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <317AD291.6B3E@ix.netcom.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Elliot Bain <ebain@ix.netcom.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: SOMEONE SAID THIS!
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
Dan Ablan wrote:
>
> > Whenever you decide to spend resources to increase revenues, you have to
> > decide if the marginal increase in business is worth the investment. If it
> > doesn't cost too much to make a render plugin for Max or 3DS, and they can
> > see an increase in sales as a result, they'd have to be pretty short-sighted
> > to pass on the opportunity.
> >
> > Looked at in this light, I think a Lightwave render plugin for 3DS/Max would
> > be a good idea, and a good way to increase business.
> >
> > The only business reason not to do it would be the expectation of lower
> > sales.
>
> With all due respect, putting a LW plug in in 3DSMAX is like